STEP 1—ASSESS: We assess the system’s reality map to identify limits, existing ecological viability, bidirectional risks, and the structures and behaviors governing system response.
Reality Map
Our AI-assisted reasoning engine produces an interactive reality map of your system—revealing how parts relate, influence one another, and where it stands in relation to ecological limits and viability conditions.
This presentation shows how the system is organized, what it depends on, and what depends on it in return.
Interactions, feedback, and pressures between components become visible across the system.
The result is a clear picture of how your system behaves today—and the questions that illuminate where gaps exist, how they emerged, and what they obscure.
This presentation shows how the system is organized, what it depends on, and what depends on it in return.
Interactions, feedback, and pressures between components become visible across the system.
The result is a clear picture of how your system behaves today—and the questions that illuminate where gaps exist, how they emerged, and what they obscure.
Quality Constant Discovery
Every system operates around a constant that is often engaged with quantitatively but defined by its underlying qualities—its traits, properties, and characteristics.
This constant is non-negotiable for the system’s coherence, yet it is also frequently the point through which ecological limits are crossed.
We identify it early to support risk assessment and alignment with ecological viability, clarifying what must remain intact and where systemic risk accumulates.
This constant is non-negotiable for the system’s coherence, yet it is also frequently the point through which ecological limits are crossed.
We identify it early to support risk assessment and alignment with ecological viability, clarifying what must remain intact and where systemic risk accumulates.
Response-Ability Diagnostics
We assess how your system responds to change today—often referred to as responsiveness—whether that change is initiated by you or imposed by external conditions.
This diagnostic reveals where responses are possible without destabilizing your system or the systems it relies on and where limitations are already present or emerging.
To do this, we developed our system specifically to identify response-ability in real-world systems, rather than relying on hypothetical scenarios or simulations.
This diagnostic reveals where responses are possible without destabilizing your system or the systems it relies on and where limitations are already present or emerging.
To do this, we developed our system specifically to identify response-ability in real-world systems, rather than relying on hypothetical scenarios or simulations.
Adaptive Range Identification
We reveal the range within which your system can adapt inside ecological limits, without undermining its coherence or the systems that sustain it.
We work within the established thresholds and boundaries of the planetary boundaries framework, as developed by the Stockholm Resilience Centre and monitored through ongoing assessments by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
We then identify where the system is interacting with, or exerting pressure on, these boundaries.
Recognizing these signals clarifies where adaptation remains possible, where limitations are forming, and where further action would constitute overreach—increasing the risk of overshoot.
We work within the established thresholds and boundaries of the planetary boundaries framework, as developed by the Stockholm Resilience Centre and monitored through ongoing assessments by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
We then identify where the system is interacting with, or exerting pressure on, these boundaries.
Recognizing these signals clarifies where adaptation remains possible, where limitations are forming, and where further action would constitute overreach—increasing the risk of overshoot.
Diagnostic Analysis Report
Your system’s current state, distilled with precision.
A structural synthesis of capabilities, constraints, risks, reciprocal relationships, and interactions with ecological limits.
It clarifies where capacity exists, where limitations require attention, and where further action would increase risk rather than resilience.
A structural synthesis of capabilities, constraints, risks, reciprocal relationships, and interactions with ecological limits.
It clarifies where capacity exists, where limitations require attention, and where further action would increase risk rather than resilience.
We uncover the relationships that shape system constraints. Roughly
79% of systems
misjudge their adaptive range
72%
Micro-challenges signal ecological limits and structural limitations long before internal metrics detect them.
98%
Reciprocal dependencies shape outcomes at boundaries and feed impacts back into systems more than internal strategies.
We leverage Assess Phase findings to design viable pathways within ecological viability constraints, where economic viability can persist over time, while addressing structural and behavioral limitations.
Viable Adaptive Pathways Blueprints
We design viable pathways by configuring how a system can operate within its adaptive range without violating ecological viability constraints.
Each blueprint maps the conditions, dependencies, and structural requirements that must hold for a pathway to remain viable over time.
Rather than prescribing outcomes, the blueprint clarifies where movement is possible, where constraints apply, and how different configurations affect long-term viability.
This provides a clear basis for subsequent structural design, response-ability development, and measurement—without assuming expansion or guaranteeing growth.
Each blueprint maps the conditions, dependencies, and structural requirements that must hold for a pathway to remain viable over time.
Rather than prescribing outcomes, the blueprint clarifies where movement is possible, where constraints apply, and how different configurations affect long-term viability.
This provides a clear basis for subsequent structural design, response-ability development, and measurement—without assuming expansion or guaranteeing growth.
Structural Reciprocity Design
We design the interactions and flows that allow systems to reinforce one another instead of draining one another.
Structural reciprocity design addresses what is often missing in impact initiatives: the configuration of relationships that allows positive change to persist without displacing pressure elsewhere.
Rather than prescribing what impact should be, this work identifies where impact solutions lack reciprocal structure and designs the interactions and flows needed to reinforce systems instead of draining them. These structures reduce strain, prevent hidden debt, and support continuity over time.
Structural reciprocity does not assume outcomes or guarantee regeneration. It establishes the structural conditions required for impact efforts to remain viable within ecological limits, so positive intent is not undermined by delayed feedback or unintended boundary pressure.
Structural reciprocity design addresses what is often missing in impact initiatives: the configuration of relationships that allows positive change to persist without displacing pressure elsewhere.
Rather than prescribing what impact should be, this work identifies where impact solutions lack reciprocal structure and designs the interactions and flows needed to reinforce systems instead of draining them. These structures reduce strain, prevent hidden debt, and support continuity over time.
Structural reciprocity does not assume outcomes or guarantee regeneration. It establishes the structural conditions required for impact efforts to remain viable within ecological limits, so positive intent is not undermined by delayed feedback or unintended boundary pressure.
Regenerative Response Viability
Many systems now incorporate closed feedback loops to address pressure on planetary boundaries and its effects. While this change represents a structural shift, the effects of these loops are not inherently regenerative.
The scope and scale of their impact depend on whether the response remains viable within the ecological context—specifically, whether it respects both biocapacity and biodiversity capacity.
Regenerative response viability describes this condition. Veridez develops its systems to identify, determine, and support the refinement and iteration of feedback mechanisms so they can operate within ecological viability, rather than amplifying pressure on planetary boundaries.
The scope and scale of their impact depend on whether the response remains viable within the ecological context—specifically, whether it respects both biocapacity and biodiversity capacity.
Regenerative response viability describes this condition. Veridez develops its systems to identify, determine, and support the refinement and iteration of feedback mechanisms so they can operate within ecological viability, rather than amplifying pressure on planetary boundaries.
Viability Metrics & Feedback
We establish metrics and feedback mechanisms that support system perseverance by tracking alignment with ecological viability, reciprocal structure, and the system’s quality constant.
These signals distinguish adaptation from drift, reveal early strain, and indicate when realignment is required—allowing systems to persist through change without destabilization or boundary breach.
These signals distinguish adaptation from drift, reveal early strain, and indicate when realignment is required—allowing systems to persist through change without destabilization or boundary breach.
Implementation Roadmap
Rather than prescribing ideal end-states, the roadmap translates structural insight into coordinated steps that respect system timing, reciprocal relationships, and response-viability, reducing the risk of both ecological and operational disruption during transition.
This approach supports implementation that remains viable in practice as well as in principle—grounded in real-world constraints while staying within ecological limits.
This approach supports implementation that remains viable in practice as well as in principle—grounded in real-world constraints while staying within ecological limits.
Start Building Structural Resilience
Turn assessment into action and design pathways your system is truly ready for.
